U.S. weighs retaliation to alleged Chinese cyberattacks

https://i1.wp.com/asset1.cbsistatic.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2013/01/30/070302_chinamob.jpgThe Obama administration is considering further action after the failure of high-level talks with Chinese officials over cyberattacks against America, according to the Associated Press. (Perhaps our efforts would be better spent in identifying what our security weaknesses are and thereby providing us with more control on how to defend our systems.)

The AP reports that two former U.S. officials say the administration is currently preparing a new National Intelligence Estimate — a governmental assessment of concerns relating to security — in order to better understand and analyze the persistence of cyberattacks that come from China.

Once this is complete, it will apparently be possible to better address the security threat, as well as justify actions to defend both the general public and national security.

The new National Intelligence Estimate will address cyberattacks as a threat to the economy — often seen when you consider not only the problems caused by downtime, but also in relation to the money that organizations and businesses have to spend in order to defend against and repair the damage left by cyberattackers.

One U.S. official said that it will “cite more directly a role by the Chinese government in such espionage,” according to the news agency.

In addition, the report is expected to address ways to pave the way for diplomatic and trade measures against the government unless the situation is placed under control. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said this week: “We have to begin making it clear to the Chinese that the United States is going to have to take action to protect not only our government’s, but our private sector, from this kind of illegal intrusions.”

Possible measures include the cancellation of specific visas or a restriction on importing Chinese goods.

Both the New York Times and Wall Street Journal recently claimed to be victims of these kinds of attacks. The NYT said was a persistent target for hackers based in China — pointing an accusatory finger at security firm Symantec for not protecting it — and this resulted in data breaches where passwords and administrative details were stolen. The WSJ says that it has had to combat cyberattacks for “several years” and suggested that confidential emails may have eventually made their way to Chinese officials.

However, attacks against media outlets that may originate from China are not isolated incidents. There has been a string of data breaches and cyberattacks against American banks, universities and companies — many said to come from the Asian superpower.

The Chinese government and military have denied responsibility over monitoring or hacking. The Defense Ministry said that Chinese law forbids “hacking and any other actions that damage Internet security,” and that the “Chinese military has never supported any hacking activities.”

The White House declined to comment on the possibility of tough sanctions against China, but spokesperson Caitlin Hayden said: “The United States has substantial and growing concerns about the threats to U.S. economic and national security posed by cyber intrusions, including the theft of commercial information. We have repeatedly raised our concerns with senior Chinese officials, including in the military, and we will continue to do so.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of the author. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided "as-is". The author shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.
%d bloggers like this: